This is the letter that appeared today on ST forum.

I HOPE the political parties contesting the general election will agree to televised debates.

Every political party should be represented in the debates, which should be aired on prime time.

The information that Singaporeans will get out of the debates will be invaluable in helping us decide on who to vote for.

Ng Zhao Yang

The following is the original letter sent to ST.

Dear Editor,

On 10 May 2010 my letter with respect to having televised debates about election issues in Singapore just as what happened in the United Kingdom was published. I am writing in again to state my desire that such televised debates do happen. I hope that the parties who are contesting the elections would be able to come together in a studio, with a strong moderator who will keep the debates on track and not degenerate into a mud-slinging session. At the same time, this allows for the majority of citizens to understand what are each party’s manifestos and also for each party to debate with each other on their stance on key issues such as cost of living and immigration.

I sincerely hope that this will happen. I understand that already Channel News Asia had an episode of Talking Point which was similar. However, I feel that every party should be represented and these debates should be televised at prime time so as to ensure that every person in Singapore will have the opportunity to view it. The information that Singaporeans will get out of the debate will be invaluable when we go to the polls to exercise our democratic rights.

Yours sincerely,

Ng Zhao Yang

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bertha Henson: Red tape and red faces

~ By Bertha Henson ~ Another day of bad memories. I am referring to…

Netizens point out that minority candidate for president is an act of tokenism

The report by the Constitutional Commission headed by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon on…

社论:让好男儿安全回家吧

在上个周六(3日),可能有些人正和家人享受周末悠闲时光,但是对全职国民服役军人刘凯的家人来说,却是痛心伤感的一天。刘凯在参与军训时,驾驶的路虎被倒退的Bionix步兵战车撞上,事发后刘凯失去意识,经抢救惟最终在10点35分宣告死亡。 22岁,正值青春年华,他和所有本土青年一样,履行公民义务参与国民服役。但最后却等不到和家人团聚。死者二姐悲恸表示,母亲4月被诊断患癌,祖母5月逝世,如今弟弟不幸英年早逝,让他们一家在一年内遭遇三重打击。 国防部指出,警方已在调查这起事故,一支独立调查委员会(COI)也会调查事故导因,为确保适当的安全措施都到位,陆军已暂停所有训练。 这是过去14个月来,第三起涉及国民服役军训的死亡案例。 近一年第三起国民服役死亡事故 国防部长黄永宏在今年五月,曾在国会发表声明,指在过去20年里,平均每年发生一起国民服役军训死亡事故,不过在2013至2016年期间,没有发生任何类似死亡事故。 我们刚在今年4月,失去了李函轩一等中士;今年五月,22岁的郭俨进也离我们而去;再到前日,又传出另一大好青年因意外而逝世。 黄永宏部长曾指出,尽量让军训做到“零死亡事故”,武装部队必须不断加强安全措施,但他坦言军训比一般活动来得危险,要确保每次军训都万无一失并不容易。 一名读者Simon Lim,致函《网络公民》,指出国民服役对国家至关重要,但是,他作为一名家长、以及一名前全职国民服役军人,对又一名服役青年离世感到悲痛。 “政府应清楚自身肩负重任” 他直言,家长看着孩子走进军营,人民行动党应该理解,他们有神圣的责任,监督和确保这些好男儿接受扎实、安全的训练,最重要的是,让他们活着回到父母身边。…

黄循财坚称屋主不是租户

国家发展部长黄循财反驳,公共组屋买家只是租户,不拥有组屋产权的说法,是“不符事实和法理的”,也没有根据。 他提醒,有关住房政策的辩论应该基于事实,而不是误导性的消息。 黄循财在昨日出席公共组屋专业建设高峰论坛。接受媒体采访时,他坚称,不论是私有或公共的租赁产业,买家在租赁期间(period of lease),都能对对自己的产业行使所有人权益。 “他们可以透过出售房产从中受益,或者出租出去。” 他强调,住房政策一直都备受热议,民众可能对它有不同看法,政府也愿聆听各界意见来继续改善。 他指出,自从政府在1967年落实土地买卖计划以来,所有私人住宅地买卖都只有99年的租赁期。这是因为国内土地不足,需要循环利用土地,为将来世代建设足够的住宅。 事实上,在更早前,总理李显龙在上月24日在一项活动上致词时,就尝试反击有关组屋的99年屋契只是长期租约的说法。 李总理:99年屋契“长期租约”不可思议 他直言这种想法“不可思议”,很多私人住宅地契也是99年,但是没人说那是租赁。他边界,公共组屋的屋主,可以自住、转售、或遗赠后代,享有的好处其实比私宅屋主更多。 针对我国为何不仿效他国的廉价租房政策,李显龙则解释,“租户”和“屋主”对待房产的态度不一样。租户不会对房产长期价值感兴趣,但是屋主就会负起维持房子状态的责任,也会捍卫可影响房价的社会暨相关制度。…